Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 01:23
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What does pompano fish taste like?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
NASA sets new potential launch date for Ax-4 mission to ISS - SpaceNews
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What discoveries in AI research have changed our understanding of intelligence evolution?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Netanyahu says ‘we’ll do what we need to do’ with Iran’s leader - Financial Times
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Harvard study says Vitamin D may actually slow down aging - Times of India
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.